J Affect Disord. 2025 Mar 19:S0165-0327(25)00445-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.097. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of krill- and fish-oil interventions on clinical symptoms and metabolic risk factors in individuals with MDD.
METHODS: In this randomized study, 57 adults diagnosed with MDD were allocated to receive krill-oil (520 mg EPA + DHA), fish-oil (600 mg EPA + DHA), or a placebo (soybean-oil) daily for 8 weeks. Anthropometric measurements, depression anxiety stress-21 (DASS-21) scale, and Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) were performed at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks. In addition, venous blood samples were collected at baseline and post-intervention to evaluate lipid and glycemic profiles, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-c, and HDL-c levels.SPSS and R Studio software programs were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 50 participants completed the study, with 17 in each intervention group and 16 in the placebo. The mean HDRS scores decreased significantly in both the krill-oil (8.5 ± 1.2) and fish-oil groups (10.0 ± 1.2) compared to the placebo (p < 0.001), indicating clinical symptom improvement. Furthermore, the interaction effect of group-by-time was found to be statistically significant (η2p = 0.273;ptime×group < 0.001). Anxiety and distress scores decreased to similar levels after the post-intervention compared to baseline in krill- and fish-oil groups. Krill- and fish-oil supplementation increased plasma HDL-c and uric acid levels, but the group-by-time interaction effect was only observed at the HDL-c level (η2p = 0.238;ptime×group = 0.002). The mean HbA1c rates and plasma triglyceride levels of krill-oil recipients were lower after the post-intervention.
CONCLUSION: Krill- and fish-oil could be considered as a safe and effective adjuvant treatments for depression. However, there was no evidence of apparent superiority over each other.
PMID:40118278 | DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.097
Recent Comments